<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: YouTube may have to go offline in Brazil</title> <atom:link href="http://www.multilingual-search.com/youtube-must-go-offline-in-brazil/04/01/2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.multilingual-search.com/youtube-must-go-offline-in-brazil/04/01/2007/</link> <description>Global Search Engine Marketing News And Global Social Media</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Marcelo Sant'Iago</title><link>http://www.multilingual-search.com/youtube-must-go-offline-in-brazil/04/01/2007/comment-page-1/#comment-10096</link> <dc:creator>Marcelo Sant'Iago</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:31:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multilingual-search.com/youtube-must-go-offline-in-brazil/04/01/2007/en-GB/#comment-10096</guid> <description>Dear Mick, Thanks for your comment. Brazil accounts for second largest audience in YouTube. Because of that, one of the top destinations for search campaigns using &quot;site targeting&quot; at Google Content network is directed to brazilian users in YouTube. This same news was posted at Search Engine Journal and Search Engine Land blogs, so I guess it is relevant for the SEM market indeed. Hope that answers your question Best, Marcelo</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mick,<br /> Thanks for your comment.<br /> Brazil accounts for second largest audience in YouTube. Because of that, one of the top destinations for search campaigns using &#8220;site targeting&#8221; at Google Content network is directed to brazilian users in YouTube.<br /> This same news was posted at Search Engine Journal and Search Engine Land blogs, so I guess it is relevant for the SEM market indeed.<br /> Hope that answers your question<br /> Best,<br /> Marcelo</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mick</title><link>http://www.multilingual-search.com/youtube-must-go-offline-in-brazil/04/01/2007/comment-page-1/#comment-10079</link> <dc:creator>mick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:43:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multilingual-search.com/youtube-must-go-offline-in-brazil/04/01/2007/en-GB/#comment-10079</guid> <description>What does YouTube &amp; sex tapes in Brazil have to do with multilingual searching?Google owns YouTube - so what?Threads like this devalue this email group.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does YouTube &amp; sex tapes in Brazil have to do with multilingual searching?</p><p>Google owns YouTube &#8211; so what?</p><p>Threads like this devalue this email group.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nuno HipÃ³lito</title><link>http://www.multilingual-search.com/youtube-must-go-offline-in-brazil/04/01/2007/comment-page-1/#comment-10021</link> <dc:creator>Nuno HipÃ³lito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 16:12:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multilingual-search.com/youtube-must-go-offline-in-brazil/04/01/2007/en-GB/#comment-10021</guid> <description>YouTube always had copyright issues surrounding it. But now with Google being in the picture, the stakes are higher for the YouTube team to act fast...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube always had copyright issues surrounding it. But now with Google being in the picture, the stakes are higher for the YouTube team to act fast&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Database Caching 3/12 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk

Served from: www.multilingual-search.com @ 2012-02-11 21:12:43 -->
