World Edition
Multilingual search marketing and search engine statistics worldwide
ICANN U-turn over outdated domains
Nick Wilsdon Feb 11, 2007 According to Cnews, plans by ICANN to delete some of the more ‘outdated’ domain extensions in their index have been derailed. They had opened a public discussion in San Paulo with a view to removing these extensions, which ended last month. Top of their list of their list for deletion was the Russian .su (Soviet Union) extension and the former Yogoslav Republic’s .yu.
However the public proceedings have been dogged by protests and threats of legal action from domain owners, less than happy at the prospect of loosing their domain, marketing and branding expenses. ICANN finally agreed to leave the extensions alone.
This is not the first time ICANN have deleted an extension, Great Britain’s .gb, was replaced by .uk, East Germany’s .dd and Zaire’s .zr after the country became the Democratic Republic of the Congo. However supporters of the .yu and .su domains have pointed out that these extensions are far from obsolete, they have a healthy number of subscribers. There are currently 7′000 .su domains in circulation, with an additional 250 being sold each month.
The .su domain has remained popular in Russia, despite it’s higher cost, because so many valuable one-word phrases and brands remain available. This news will certainly breath new life into these extensions and their continued growth will make it even harder, if not impossible for ICANN to close them in the future.
5 Responses to “ICANN U-turn over outdated domains”
Leave a Reply
Managing Editor
Regional Editors
sjachille
Sante J. Achille
[More]
Nick Wilsdon
e3internet
[More]
David Temple
Neo@Ogilvy
[More]
Marina Zaliznyak
Mediavant
[More]
AussieWebmaster
Smart Keywords
[More]
Kristjan Mar Hauksson
Nordice eMarketing
[More]
Marcelo Sant'Iago
iProspect
[More]
Nuno Hipólito
Search Marketing
[More]
Georgi Georgiev
Investor BG PLC
[More]
Sara Andersson
Global Strategies International
[More]
Gilad Sasson
Search Marketing
[More]
Rasmus Sorensen
Notabene
[More]
Ana Leckenby
WebCertain.com
[More]
Robin Gurney
Altex Marketing
[More]
Latest News
- The US Can Learn From Europe On Mobile Search
- Is ‘Conversion Optimisation’ The Next Big Thing In International Online Marketing? #SES
- There Is A Lot More Than English When It Comes To Twitter
- Google Italy: The Difference Between Freedom and Being Responsible
- Scent of Information at the International Search Summit
- SES London Global SEO:Domains, Hosting and Geo-targeting #SES
- Website Translation or International SEO? 92% of Website Translators Ignore SEO?
- Hitwise Ventures Outside English With France Launch. Oh la la!
- YouTube shares tips for global video marketing at International Search Summit
- Google Buzz Is Off As Bing Bites
Partners
Useful Resources
Contributors
- Multilingual Search is looking for new contributors! Contact us for more information.
Tag Cloud
Related News
- Russian .SU Increases Stakes in ICANN Fight
- Cultural and linguistic TLDs? Galician Association prepares its .gal candidacy
- ICANN to approve .asia domain
- ICANN: Preparing to internationalize domains
Hot Topics Today
- World statistics on the number of internet shoppers (22 views)
- French Yellow Pages directory - Pages Jaunes - launches 'click to call' in France - for free (9 views)
- 90% of Japanese bloggers willing to write product reviews for reward (8 views)
- SES London Global SEO:Domains, Hosting and Geo-targeting #SES (8 views)
- Top 10 Dutch websites = Search (7 views)
- ComScore Reveals Google Share by Market (6 views)
- India ranks third biggest e-shopping nation online today (6 views)
- Oh-No You Didn't! UCC Coffee Spilled Over Twitter (5 views)
- Is Facebook a Global threat to Google? (5 views)
- Facebook Hiring in Brazil (5 views)
Hottest Topics
- World statistics on the number of internet shoppers (28942 views)
- Global Search Report 2007 - free PDF download released (26453 views)
- 90% of Japanese bloggers willing to write product reviews for reward (25200 views)
- French Yellow Pages directory - Pages Jaunes - launches 'click to call' in France - for free (24561 views)
- Orkut is visiting Brazil (15677 views)
- Google Brasil - Year One (14208 views)
- Google opens office in Singapore (12486 views)
- LinguaWeb (11813 views)
- Walla.co.il - #2 search media in Israel moves to PPC (11266 views)
- New Russian Search Engine Gogo Launched (11179 views)
February 13th, 2007 at 12:33 am
ICANN started a consultation process by asking for public comments on the current policy. It is now reviewing those comments.
To clarify, ICANN has not made any statements of any kind that it will change policies, including it has not “agreed to leave the extensions alone”.
The current policy is that ICANN does not decide what constitutes a valid country-code, that is determined by the ISO 3166-1 standard which is not administered by ICANN.
February 16th, 2007 at 7:53 am
[…] The proposal to delete some outdated ccTLDs by ICANN is addressed by an article in the Russian language Cnews and reported in English by Multilingual Search. The article claims the proposal has been derailed. Following discussions in Sao Paulo, Cnews claims “the public proceedings have been dogged by protests and threats of legal action from domain owners, less than happy at the prospect of loosing their domain, marketing and branding expenses. ICANN finally agreed to leave the extensions alone.” See http://www.multilingual-search.com/icann-u-turn-over-outdated-domains/11/02/2007/en/ for the full article or for the original CNews story in Russian, see http://www.cnews.ru/news/top/index.shtml?2007/02/07/234517. […]
February 17th, 2007 at 10:44 pm
Kim, If the ISO 3166-a standard determines a valid country code and ICANN does not administer that code then why is ICANN starting a “consultation process” by asking for and reviewing public comments. Is ICANN providing recommendations for or against the changes then? What exactly is ICANN’s role in all of this and who makes the final deterination?
February 18th, 2007 at 4:16 am
ICANN is not providing recommendations for or against changes. What happens is that when the ISO 3166-1 standard removes a code, the operators are advised that they need to transition to the new code(s) that represent the country. IANA entrusts the operator to do this in a responsible way the meets with the needs of the local Internet community.
In some circumstances, the operators have either taken a disproportionately long time to decommission the code, or in some cases, actively promote it as available for registration to new registrants.
The review is to indentify if the current procedure of retirement of country-codes can be improved. It is not to suggest ICANN should start deciding what is or isn’t a valid country code.
February 18th, 2007 at 8:44 am
Thanks for commenting here Kim and your clarification on the matter.
Decommissioning an extension when so many owners stand to loose their investment in building that branding is problematic. Unlike the .gb extension which has sold a mere handful of domains, the .su extension is still thriving. I can’t see any progress down this route that meet the needs of the local Internet community.
The .su/.ru situation has risen out of extraordinary circumstances. It seems wrong that domain owners should be penalized for these.
Not to be controversial but I also find the one code/one country argument a little weak in light of America’s current position. They have assumed a practical hold over .com as well as the country code of .us. Take Google.us for example, which redirects to the .com version of the engine. Until we have a more international treatment of the TLD’s, critising Russia for having two ccTLD seems a little unfair.