<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: EURid suspends 10,000 .EU names squatted in China</title> <atom:link href="http://www.multilingual-search.com/eurid-suspends-10000-eu-names-squatted-in-china/10/09/2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.multilingual-search.com/eurid-suspends-10000-eu-names-squatted-in-china/10/09/2007/</link> <description>Global Search Engine Marketing News And Global Social Media</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Jean Guillon</title><link>http://www.multilingual-search.com/eurid-suspends-10000-eu-names-squatted-in-china/10/09/2007/comment-page-1/#comment-43998</link> <dc:creator>Jean Guillon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:14:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multilingual-search.com/eurid-suspends-10000-eu-names-squatted-in-china/10/09/2007#comment-43998</guid> <description>I do totally agree there is no need of 10 000 .EU, I wanted to mention that again. Now my idea about fighting cyber squatting right after a landrush starts during accreditation at the registry. The registry is the one to have a responsibility in cyber squatting: checking networks of accredited Registrars is a â€œmust-doâ€ prior to Sunrises and Landrush. Too many domains where made available for bidding on pool.com right after Landrush for .EU. Was it fair? Is bidding fair for the final consumer, the Registrant? Is the .ASIA registration process the right one?I once though bidding was a solution because it finally is a cheaper and faster way to find a solution instead of going to court. Today my fear is every registry starts to do the same: bidding is an efficient way to get rid of problems fast. I think the consumer has no other way butâ€¦to pay.Sharing a domain name is a solution prior to bidding or finding an agreement. After allâ€¦if a name is branded, why not share/rent a page at the Registry until an agreement is found?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do totally agree there is no need of 10 000 .EU, I wanted to mention that again. Now my idea about fighting cyber squatting right after a landrush starts during accreditation at the registry. The registry is the one to have a responsibility in cyber squatting: checking networks of accredited Registrars is a â€œmust-doâ€ prior to Sunrises and Landrush. Too many domains where made available for bidding on pool.com right after Landrush for .EU. Was it fair? Is bidding fair for the final consumer, the Registrant? Is the .ASIA registration process the right one?</p><p>I once though bidding was a solution because it finally is a cheaper and faster way to find a solution instead of going to court. Today my fear is every registry starts to do the same: bidding is an efficient way to get rid of problems fast. I think the consumer has no other way butâ€¦to pay.</p><p>Sharing a domain name is a solution prior to bidding or finding an agreement. After allâ€¦if a name is branded, why not share/rent a page at the Registry until an agreement is found?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andy Atkins-KrÃ¼ger</title><link>http://www.multilingual-search.com/eurid-suspends-10000-eu-names-squatted-in-china/10/09/2007/comment-page-1/#comment-43991</link> <dc:creator>Andy Atkins-KrÃ¼ger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:47:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multilingual-search.com/eurid-suspends-10000-eu-names-squatted-in-china/10/09/2007#comment-43991</guid> <description>Jean - if you&#039;re a large company with many different brands, products and marketing campaigns - it&#039;s actually not difficult to get up to the number of domain names.  But having had the sunrise period and making life very difficult for trademark owners to get together every last piece of paperwork - how can we end up with such a case of cybersquatting.  Something does feel right in this story.Andy</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean &#8211; if you&#8217;re a large company with many different brands, products and marketing campaigns &#8211; it&#8217;s actually not difficult to get up to the number of domain names.  But having had the sunrise period and making life very difficult for trademark owners to get together every last piece of paperwork &#8211; how can we end up with such a case of cybersquatting.  Something does feel right in this story.</p><p>Andy</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jean Guillon</title><link>http://www.multilingual-search.com/eurid-suspends-10000-eu-names-squatted-in-china/10/09/2007/comment-page-1/#comment-43990</link> <dc:creator>Jean Guillon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:24:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.multilingual-search.com/eurid-suspends-10000-eu-names-squatted-in-china/10/09/2007#comment-43990</guid> <description>Hello,Having worked for a Registry (EURid during Surise and Landrus periods), as a Registrant managing a large domain name portfolio and recently for the biggest Corporate Registrar as a consultant, I kind of disagree with one thing here. Many companies have 10 000+ domain names. Some corporations need a local presence worldwide. Securing a brand in major countries requires registering a ccTLD. If you own 50 brands... But I agree with one thing here: no one needs 10 000 .EU: the European Comission maybe ? Regards,Jean Guillon</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>Having worked for a Registry (EURid during Surise and Landrus periods), as a Registrant managing a large domain name portfolio and recently for the biggest Corporate Registrar as a consultant, I kind of disagree with one thing here. Many companies have 10 000+ domain names. Some corporations need a local presence worldwide. Securing a brand in major countries requires registering a ccTLD. If you own 50 brands&#8230;<br /> But I agree with one thing here: no one needs 10 000 .EU: the European Comission maybe ?<br /> Regards,</p><p>Jean Guillon</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Database Caching 3/12 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk

Served from: www.multilingual-search.com @ 2012-02-12 14:05:12 -->
